1 John 5:20 – And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, [even] in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life
Do you ever sit and ask yourself: ” Why am I here?”, only to find yourself asking the next question, ” Why am I asking myself why I am here”? Next follows, “Why do I care to ask myself why I care about asking myself why I care?” “Why do I care that I care that I care that I care?” In other words, why do we always second guess ourselves? I tend to find myself thinking in fifth person a lot; questioning the why’s of the why’s of the why. It goes with the territory. We are living in a multi-dimensional reality, yet we strive to perceive an absolution of truth based on the limitations of our six senses. How then, do you remove yourself from the questioner who is questioning the question about the question’s question? Who is the real omniscient narrator? Or, as Eminem would say “Will the real slim shady, please stand up?” Its like putting two mirrors facing each other, hoping to capture and find the true image, the true source, the true beginning. But the reflections go on forever, don’t they? Until, you simply can’t see the reflection of the last reflection because its too small to your naked eye. Still, you recognize the pattern and you know there must be more than what meets the eye. After all, before you put the two mirrors facing each other, you only perceived two mirrors and two reflections were possible with each mirror reflecting the other. But once the reflection became the actual reflection of a reflections reflection, you went seeking after the reflection of the reflection. You then found an endless array of reflections you never even knew were there. In life, we often seek for the one true reflection. Our very being cries out to know and discover a source of all that is. Why are we designed this way?
If your consciousness and awareness could be measured on a scale, its measurement would be based on a program ran since birth to believe that: a) we start at zero, b) this zero is balance, c) is also ‘nothing’. This program suggests that the concept of a source must be the absence of everything, thus allowing for all things to be added from that point. Yet, even in the world of mathematics, we know that there is a point also on the number line that is less that zero, such as : -1, -2, -3, and so on … into ‘infinity‘. The eternal dilemma becomes apparent when you realize that even so, no one has ever defined what ‘infinity’ is, except that it is a unit of measurement without measure. ( Is that even possible?)
If we step even slightly further out of the perspective of linear thinking, we can conceive that there then must exist a concept of negative infinity traveling against time and space; traveling contrary to the additions to nothing, or zero. So then, there is the possibility to have ‘less than nothing’. The concept ‘less than nothing’ is an enigma trapped inside an enigma, in and of its own design. If the value of A is less than the value of B, and B is already represented as “Nothing”, then we must have an inadequate representation of “Nothing” at best. To represent that “Nothing” represents “Something” of which a value can be removed from it’s total is to say that nothing is not really nothing.
We may further conceive of this by realizing that there is more than one way to arrive at +1, which is 1 more that zero but can also be 101 more than -100. If one has -2 then to arrive at +1 they have to first compensate for a debt to the balance which is equal to two times the value of 1 unit of the existence which is being measured. This debt may be represented as a resistance. To arrive at +1, from -2, a resistance of 3 times the 1 unit of existence represented as + 1 must be repaid first, and yet…. To what and to whom? If negative infinity represents a debt owed to the universe to even arrive at balance – represented as (o) or “nothing”, we must believe that all things to go back to balance at Zero, where nothing is owed and nothing is gained .
The flaw in this linear thinking becomes even more apparent when we realize that we also have no real definition for “infinity” in terms of linear thinking. What is infinity? All we know of infinity is that it is infinite; meaning limitless, and without boundaries. Yet still, the question remains: how far into infinity (into negative or positive measures of reality ) is it possible to go before existence, or lack of existence as we know it begins to collapse back into the antithesis of it’s unit of measurement? We know from the life cycle that there is constant death and birth continuously. So life is coming in and out of existence .To this day we have not figured out how to stop death nor have we figured out how to obliterate what is: ‘existence’. Although some say ‘existence’ is obliterated at death, we have a record of history to prove that theory false. Even if we figured out a way to blow up the entire planet, there is no way we possess the power to stop the existence of the universe as we know it, which is far to expansive to even comprehend.
Still, this theory suggests there is some kind of cosmic debt to be payed to the source, because we know we live in a world with a tremendous amount of resistance. But what does it even mean to have a cosmic debt that needs to be paid before you can even arrive at balance, or nothing (0)? As we’ve said, if there is the possibility to have less than nothing than nothing is not really nothing; exemplified in it’s relationship of proximity to “being something” relative to a negative value of nothing. If it takes double the capacity spent from O-1 of “whatever is”, for -1 to arrive at 1, then “negative existence” which is less than the existence of nothing, represents a measurement of resistance double to that of the normal force required to add to or expand existence. Thus, “negative existence” can be seen as any resistance to the normal progression of the expansion of existence when starting from nothing or zero. At Zero then or Nothing, balance is quantified by the absence of resistance as well as existence.
Romans 13:8 -Owe no one anything, except to love each other, for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law.
What then is Truth? One may say” 1+1=2, and this is the “Truth“. In “Truth”, this is merely ‘A Truth’. To be “The Truth”, if would have to not only be ‘A Truth’ ,but it would have to be “The Only Truth” regarding ‘that Truth’ of What is ‘Represented’, which is the “number 2”. Isn’t it also true to say if -101+ 2=2 , and each negative number ( all 101) represent a measurement of the same unit of time and/ space/quantity as the positive numbers, then -101+ 2 also = 2 . Thus, 1+1=2 is not, as they would say in a court of law,’ The Truth, The Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth’. 1+1=2 becomes merely a fact ( a facet of truth). -101+2=2 becomes another facet. Negative (-) infinity +2 becomes another, and so on and so forth. We know then, that for facts to represent truth ,truth would have to allow for overlapping worlds and overlapping truths. So then, there are truths that represent facets of the puzzle of a greater truth. But the question remains, What is Truth?
Here is the truth I personally have found in Christ:
- There is no cosmic debt owed. This debt was paid by the blood of Jesus, Yahweh, Yeshua.
- Even if you believe that we go back to “nothing”, there is no real proof that “Nothing” is a Truth that exists.
- In order for Truth to exist, there has to exists overlapping worlds, which are truths.
Written By Jennifer Christine AKA Sky Watcher
John 8:32 – And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
John 14:6 – Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me
Eminem.The Marshall Mathers LP CD. 2000. Aftermath Entertainment.